The first tidbit from Jerome Corsi’s new anti-Obama book is out, and it’s … not much.
A July 30 WorldNetDaily article goes the baseless speculation route by highlighting a suggestion by Corsi — a WorldNetDaily employee, though the book itself is published under Simon & Schuster imprint Threshold Editions — that Barack Obama is still using drugs:
Corsi points out Obama has yet to explain whether he ever sold drugs or when he stopped using them.
[…]
“Did Obama ever use drugs in his days as a community organizer in Chicago, or when he was a state senator from Illinois?” Corsi asks. “How about in the U.S. Senate? If Obama quit using drugs, the public inquiry certain to occur in a general election campaign for the presidency will most certainly aim at the when, how and why questions George W. Bush successfully avoided.”Despite the seriousness of the revelation by Obama about his college drug use as late as the 1980s, there has been little attention given the issue by the political reporters who cover the candidate. In fact, none have asked the questions Corsi asks in his book – or, at least they have not published or broadcast answers if the questions were asked.
In other words, Corsi has no actual evidence that Obama still uses drugs — he’s just operating on the false-logic supposition that because Obama purportedly never declared that he stopped using drugs, he must still be.
The WND article also takes a stab at reviving Larry Sinclair:
Last year, when a Minnesota man, Larry Sinclair, made startling allegations that he used cocaine and had homosexual sex with Obama nine years earlier, the candidate was able to ignore the charges. Subsequently, Sinclair reportedly failed polygraphs.
WND seems to be suggesting that Sinclair still has some credibility; in fact, Sinclair is a career criminal who has been utterly discredited. As we’ve noted, WND never bothered to verify Sinclair’s claims before repeating them — the same offense WND and Corsi are accusing “the political reporters who cover the candidate” are doing with Obama.
If this is the most earth-shattering revelation Corsi’s book has to offer — and given that it’s the lead claim from it, it must be — it appears that Simon & Schuster wasted its (presumably not inconsiderable) money on a factually dubious smear piece.
Indeed, Corsi’s previous anti-Obama work for WND has been similarly desperate and dubious — for instance, swallowing Cliff Kincaid’s communist obsession, rehashing irrelevant stories about Obama’s father, and buying into the talking point that a large crowd that saw Obama speak actually came out to see the marginally popular indie-rock band that opened for him.
P.S. It appears to be baseless-Obama-smear day at WND; Jack Cashill (who has his own problems with factual reporting) is using his WND column to suggest — again, without actual evidence to back him up — that Obama didn’t write his books. (Coincidentally, Cashill’s most recent book was also published by Threshold Editions.)
UPDATE: Corsi’s not just desperate — he’s wrong. Media Matters points out that Corsi did, in fact, say in his book that he “stopped getting high” shortly after moving to New York City to attend Columbia University.