WorldNetDaily writer Bob Unruh’s personal hatred for transgender people continued to dominate his so-called reporting in a Nov. 19 article:
Another scientific study, published at the direction of President Donald Trump, is breaking ground because now it’s been peer-reviewed, and the potential critics were unable to find anything significant to criticize in the results that found there’s almost zero medical evidence to support the agenda of putting chemicals in children, or offering them body-mutilating surgeries, when they claim to be transgender.
In a report from the New York Post, it was confirmed that the study, done by the Department of Health and Human Services after Trump issued an executive order that charged U.S. doctors with “maiming” teens with such treatment, was found by experts to have no significant failings or errors.
There were nearly a dozen critics who took on the job of commenting on the study’s findings, and none was able to identify a deficiency.
“They were given the chance to show mistakes, show errors. And they were not able to identify any,” Dr. Leor Sapir, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and one of the project researchers, confirmed in comments to the Post. “They had some minor comments here and there, but nothing that gets to the main findings about evidence and ethics.”
The fact that Trump ordered the study and that Sapir was a prominent researcher who belongs to a right-wing think tank shows the right-wing bias of the study. Indeed, when the study was first issued in May, it was pointed out that “the review received criticism by researchers, advocates, and medical association for its methods, lack of alignment with current guidance, promotion of misinformation, support of certain practices, and decision not to disclose the authors.” Unruh also failed to detail what, if anything, changed in the study because of the peer review.
Unruh followed with a Nov. 26 article:
Another organization has spoken out about the dangers of the transgender ideology being pushed by Democrats and other leftists in America.
Joe Biden was a prominent advocate of the agenda, pushing it even onto children and insisting they be given chemicals and even body-mutilating surgeries in failed attempts to turn a boy into a girl or vice versa.
It seems that to go trans is to go stupid.
Or at least stupider.
The warning comes from a group called StatsForGender.org, which confirms it uses statistics from sources “selected for their reliability.”
Unruh didn’t mention that StatsForGender is part of an anti-transgender group called Beyond Trans, which uses a word cloud featuring statements like “Injured by Transition” and “Leaving the Trans Delusion.” In other words, the group’s report is predisposed to attack transgender people as stupid.
Unruh wrote in a Dec. 1 article:
A transgender, a man portraying himself as a woman, who was teaching at the University of Oklahoma has been taken out of the classroom and the regents have been ordered by Gov. Kevin Stitt to make certain students are not being punished for their faith.
This all after a rant from the professor, Mel Curtis, that condemned the student’s references to the Bible and faith, and instead insisted she should adopt the teacher’s ideologies.
[…]The university said the “graduate student instructor has been placed on administrative leave pending the finalization” of an investigation.
Unruh didn’t explain why religious rights supercede those of transgender people. This was followed by a Dec. 4 article in which Unruh proudly claimed that the school “has agreed to discard the TA’s failing grade on an assignment done by the student.”
Unruh cheered an anti-transgender court decision in a Dec. 9 article:
A panel of three judges on a federal appeals court has handed President Donald Trump a huge victory in his agenda to turn America’s military from a social program into a fighting force.
Specifically the judges upheld a ban implemented by Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegseth against transgenders in the ranks.
[…]The ruling, significantly, found: “The Hegseth Policy likely does not violate equal protection. We doubt that the policy triggers any form of heightened scrutiny.”
Unruh groused in a Dec. 16 article:
It’s bad enough that girls are forced to endure the presence of men in their locker rooms and on their athletic fields, now they must face hate and ridicule in their schools and communities when they object.
That’s evidenced by the testimony of a couple of girls who have experienced situations in which men invaded their private areas as female athletes.
One is Frances Staudt, whose encounter last winter has been a source of her commentary ever since.
She described how she’s been punished for objecting to the transgender ideology, which is a false agenda as being male or female is embedded in the human body to the DNA level and does not change.
Unruh did not allow anyone to rebut Staudt.