Huffington Post’s Seth Colter Walls serves up the next chapter of the Seton Motley saga in a Oct. 5 article. Walls points out that evidence that undergirded the claim advanced by both Motley and the Capital Research Center’s Matthew Vadum — that Barack Obama was a lawyer for ACORN — is false because the Project Vote organization for which Obama did serve as a lawyer was not associated with ACORN until two years after Obama’s work for the group ended.
Walls also agrees with us that Motley’s refusal to answer questions because they came from Obama’s campaign — which Motley claims is prohibited under the Media Research Center’s 501(c)(3) tax status — is bogus. The IRS states that a 501(c)(3) group “may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates; we fail to see where answering questions raised by a political campaign falls under that restriction.
Your move, Seton…