Michael Nedderman ranted in a Nov. 23 WorldNetDaily column that others aren’t as extremely anti-abortion as he is:
Pro-life organizations have done excellent work in their respective areas of operation. However, the following polling data shows that the uncoordinated pro-life community is badly losing to the reality-deniers:
Us = 13%: who believe elective abortion-homicide “should be illegal in all circumstances …”
versus
Them = 85%: 34% who believe elective abortion-homicide should be legal “under any circumstances,” plus, 51% who say elective abortion-homicide should be legal “only under certain circumstances.” (While persuadable, the 51% are not with us).
[From Gallup’s July 7, 2023, “Where do Americans stand on abortion?”]Why, after 50 years, has our pro-life 13% utterly failed to persuade the 85% who believe elective abortion-homicide should be somehow legal?
Answer: A mass-delusion (“it” isn’t human/alive) enables most of that 85% to deny the scientific/logical/moral reality that life begins at the beginning, at conception/fertilization (science uses “fertilization”).
The 85% protect their mass-delusion with “magical euphemisms” based upon the Ministry of Truth’s BIG LIE: Roe v. Wade’s genocide-authorizing legal fiction, upheld/affirmed by Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, legally defined the preborn as not even Nazi-subhuman, but merely “potential life” (“subhuman” clearly implies life). Potential means “possible, as opposed to actual,” or, “not actually alive.”
The rationale for legal fictions: just results. For example, corporations are deemed legal “persons” so they can conduct business and appear in court. According to Roe/Dobbs, the preborn are “non-persons.”
Without their BIG LIE euphemisms, the reality-denying 85% would have to acknowledge the homicidal (personal) and genocidal (national) nature of their child-sacrificing obsession. After all, who wants to admit killing their child, being a doctor far worse than Nazi “Angel of Death” Josef Mengele, or an advocate for the worst genocide in history?
In fact, “abortion” is a pro-abortion euphemism for “abortion-homicide.” Homicide: one human killing another.
One of Nedderman’s talking points for “ending abortion-homicide” is to “educate/confront/shame everyone, especially the media” on the issue. But he’s silent on whether he would take his extremism to its logical endpoint: arresting and imprisoning (and possibly executing) all women who have ever had an abortion. After all, if abortion is “homicide,” women who have had one are murderers, and murderers must be punished since there’s no statute of limitations for it.
Nedderman hammered on the “abortion-homicide” nomenclature in a Jan. 11 column:
The following corrected excerpt from Planned Parenthood’s website illustrates how this simple tactic will cause PP and the Democratic Party to lose all credibility when we refuse to use their pro-abortion euphemism. Instead, “swing” back: “Abortion-homicide.”
This excerpt from a PP webpage (with “-homicide” added) shows how that child-sacrificing cult uses “abortion” to hide the fact that every abortion is a homicide:
”The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which means that states can now ban abortion-homicide. Some states have banned abortion-homicide or created lots of restrictions. But abortion-homicide is still legal in many states, and it’s legal to go to a different state to get an abortion-homicide. Abortion-homicide is NOT banned nationwide.”
Imagine how support and the number of abortion-homicides would drop if everyone were required to use the truthful term, “abortion-homicide.”
[…]Question: What do Hitler’s Nazis, Southern slave masters and today’s abortion-homicides advocates/practitioners have in common?
Answer: Each group’s crimes against humanity were/are socially acceptable because they were/are “the law of the land” (Dobbs).
Again: If abortion is not only murder but no different than what Nazis did, all women who have ever had an abortion should be arrested and imprisoned (and possibly executed). But again, Nedderman failed to admit that this is the logical endpoint of his anti-abortion extremism.
If Nedderman won’t treat women as the evil murderers the way his anti-abortion extremism dictates they must be treated, he’s nothing but a ranting ideologue who won’t go where his logic says he should go.
By the way, according to his bio at the right-wing Western Journal, Nedderman appears to be the author of a series of anti-abortion columns WND published a while back under the pseudonymous name “PreBorn Americans United.” One of those columns complained that the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade didn’t overturn enough of it, though he did get closer to his logical endpoint: “For clarity and justice, we must have Nuremberg-style trials for the 65 million American dead.” Presumably that includes putting every woman who has ever had an abortion on trial (and, presumably, hung afterwards).