WorldNetDaily is the internet’s nexus of fake news and misinformation about COVID vaccines (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11), and the fact that we keep proving WND wrong is not dissuading it for publishing bogus information. Bob Unruh contributed more to the fake-news canon in a Sept. 5 article:
A team of researchers that included a number of medical experts as well as individuals with creditable science backgrounds has uncovered what is believed to be an “off switch” that could be used by those who were given the COVID-19 mRNA treatments, and now face that possibility of “turbo cancers, heart failure, strokes, blood clots, and damaged immune systems,” according to a new report.
It is Slay News that revealed the “historic discovery” that now “offers hope to the billions of people around the world who have been injected with the ‘vaccines.'”
The report cites a preprint study called, “Strategic Deactivation of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines: New Applications for RIBOTACs and siRNA Therapy.”
The promoters of the experimental treatment originally said the “vaccine” injection would stay in a person’s arm but tests show it spreads, which has prompted health experts to express concern about the safety.
The report confirmed the “spike protein triggered by the mRNA from the shots has been linked to multiple deadly diseases and sudden death.”
The study, led by renowned American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, uncovered a novel approach using “small interfering messenger RNA (siRNA) and ribonuclease targeting chimeras (RIBOTACs) to bind and deactivate the mRNA from these vaccines.”
The fact that 1) the lead author is McCullough, one of the most prolific spreaders of COVID misinformation out there, and 2) Unruh stole the article from Slay News, whom we’ve repeatedly caught spreading COVID fake news, should be reason enough to dismiss all of this. Further, as actual medical experts point out, COVID vaccines don’t create toxic levels of spike proteins in the body, so “detox” protocols aren’t necessary.
Unruh returned with another bogus claim in an Oct. 11 article, again taken from the unreliable Slay News:
COVID-19, that modified bat virus first spotted near a Chinese research institute that was toying around with those dangerous pathogens, undoubtedly was and remains a threat to many people.
But the shots that the world’s pharmaceuticals created to battle it also have been found to be related to heart diseases and failures as well as a multitude of other health threats.
Now even the World Health Organization, that bureaucracy that worked with China first to conceal the threat, then demanded entire populations be forced to take the experimental COVID shots, has admitted that they are problematic.
To the point they now are being blamed for creating a side effect: “Monkeypox.”
It is Slay News that revealed the admission by the WHO, a part of the United Nations.
The report confirmed the “admission” is buried deep on the WHO’s Vigiaccess web page.
Unfortunately for Unruh, Reuters has specifically debunked the article he rewrote:
The article by Slay News, a website Reuters has previously fact-checked, is headlined: “WHO Admits Monkeypox Is ‘Side Effect’ of Covid ‘Vaccine’” and was shared on Facebook.
The piece, dated Oct. 11, points to monkeypox, smallpox and cowpox being listed on the WHO’s VigiAccess website under the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence that the WHO has admitted these infections are side effects of the product.
However, VigiAccess is a portal for accessing reports of events that followed taking a drug or vaccine submitted by individuals to voluntary national databases and it does not confirm that the product caused any of the observed symptoms, according to a WHO spokesperson and the VigiAccess website.
No cases of smallpox have been documented in the world for decades and no cases of mpox or cow pox have been documented to have been caused by any vaccine.
[…]The data reflect possible reported side effects, not a confirmed link between a product and a side effect, according to a WHO spokesperson.
“Information in VigiAccess on potential side effects should not be interpreted as evidence that the medicinal product or its active substance either caused the observed effect or is unsafe for use,” the spokesperson told Reuters via email.
“The information on this website does not reflect any confirmed link between a medicinal product and a side effect,” the spokesperson said, adding that confirming a causal link is a complex process that requires a thorough assessment and detailed evaluation of all the data.
Does WND ever get tired of being proven wrong so often? If it does, perhaps it should consider not spreading lies.