Hanne Nabintu Herland spent her March 13 WorldNetDaily column cheering “strong men with hard power” running the world, since at least they’re not socialists:
Socialist Europe, which has complacently embraced the atheist Marxist narrative for decades, finds itself thrown into a new conservative paradigm. President Donald Trump has launched a significant offensive against the globalist billionaire empire that has profited from the outsourcing of jobs and wealth to China and the ultra-rich elite for decades. Europe is shocked.
Vice President J.D. Vance’s speech at the Munich security conference perfectly illustrated the problem. Since then European leaders have continued the Biden administration’s desire for war in Ukraine “down to the last Ukrainian,” while the United States pushes for peace. Europe is still running the Biden-narrative warmongering show on behalf of their masters, the globalist cabal.
Sir Alex Younger, the former head of MI6, recently provided an insightful analysis of the shifting dynamics in international relations. He pointed out that the new era will be defined by strong men with hard power, just like after World War II. At the Yalta Treaty in 1945, three strong men – the leaders of the United States, Russia and Great Britain – decided the fate of the small countries. There was little the small states could do. They were assigned the role of following up on what the strong decided.
“This is Donald Trump’s mindset,” says Younger. “It is definitely Putin’s mindset, and it is Xi Jinping’s mindset. It is the world we are moving into.” The shift is from unipolarism to multipolarism.
Herland seems confused about Ukraine — Russia is the warmonger here, not the U.S. Then again, she’s very much a Putin stooge. She went on to more specifically cheer Donald Trump’s brand of authoritarianism in her March 27 column:
Amid the seismic geopolitical changes President Donald Trump dramatically and unapologetically causes, the globalist norms that have governed the West since the fall of the Soviet Union are falling.
The world goes through fundamental changes of the type that will make history, and certain years are identified as marks of game-changing times. One such year is 1945. It marked the end of World War II and Great Britain losing its superpower status to the United States.
The year 1968 was another such year, as it signified the Marxist “free drugs and sex” revolution in the West, a fundamental revolt against traditional Western values such as the traditional family, gender roles, respect for the church, personal liberties and responsibilities. The Marxists implemented the dramatic demonization of Christianity – which set the tone for the subsequent atheist-socialist decades in Europe, and the culture war in the United States.
We are currently amid yet another important year: 2025 marks the end of the globalist unipolar era. President Donald Trump reshapes the geopolitical map, strengthening the nation state and traditional Western values as the United States reenters a historic phase of strength in a multipolar world.
[…]The Trump strategy to strengthen the nation state, decentralize power, halt waste, fraud and theft, hold government officials accountable, giving individuals more freedom and personal responsibility, may be precisely what is needed to give the decaying American giant a new golden age.
Herland served up more Trump rah-rah in her April 10 column, this time cheering his tariff regime:
President Donald Trump’s radical tariff plan marks the end of the ongoing globalist injustice that has enriched low-cost countries such as China and their Western billionaire partners at the expense of the Western worker. The Western globalist billionaire class rose to power precisely by partnering with China. The working class has been systematically impoverished, while profits and benefits have been exported to China and into the hands of the Western billionaire elite, without redistribution back to American citizens. Furthermore, mega corporations are often registered in tax havens, cleverly avoiding taxation.
After decades of outsourcing manufacturing and American expertise, some few individuals in the West have become so powerful that they also exert fundamental political influence, dominating what is left of democracy, serving solely their own interests. This is described in my book, “The Billionaire World. How Marxism Serves the Elite.”
President Trump’s stated objective is to rectify this imbalance by resuming the traditional Western capitalist principle of equal treatment irrespective of one’s national origin, halting the discrimination against the United States and revitalizing domestic investments. The objective is to establish a level playing field for all nations to compete on equal terms. The existing globalist tariff system has been based on inequality, downgrading the Western worker while favoring the Global South. This has resulted in the U.S. industry suffering in many ways, also when exporting goods to other countries.
After a lengthy rant about Marxism and socialism — something she does a lot — she concluded:
The fundamental weakness of Marxist-socialism is its inability to comprehend that power structures fluctuate. The dynamics of power relationships are subject to change over time. If China was poor decades ago, it does not mean that China will always remain the weak link. The Asian Tiger’s economic situation has evolved significantly. The ascendancy of China signifies a massive geopolitical shift in global power dynamics, and the West is significantly and way too much dependent on China. This phenomenon is precisely what President Donald Trump seeks to reverse. Trump’s rearrangement of the tariff system attacks the injustice of unequal tariffs, stops the discrimination of the United States and returns world trade to the classical Western concept of meritocracy. The hope is to halt the American decline and create a new golden age.
Herland wrote a self-published book in 2020 insisting that trump is “the most demonized president in US history. Why? Because he challenges the globalist elite, who also own the media.”