Trump Regime Media outlet WorldNetDaily has been working hard on Donald Trump’s behalf to attack judges who rule against him and his administration. This actually started before he took office.
A Jan. 10 article by Bob Unruh attacked Juan Marchan [sic], the judge who oversaw Trump’s criminal fraud trial, as someone “has a record of financially supporting Democrat [sic] candidates and whose daughter was making money from Democrats while her father was ruling against Trump in his courtroom,” dismissing the case against Trump as “lawfare.” Unruh further huffed that Merchan allowed “salacious testimony from a former porn star and a discredited lawyer in order to convince jurors in the leftist enclave of Manhattan, which repeatedly has voted by vast majorities against Trump, to convicted Trump of 34 counts,” ignoring that if “leftist” jurors were allowed on the case, it was a result of incompetence of Trump’s lawyers, who help select jurors before the trial. Unruh repeated much of this in another article that day repeating Trump’s whining about the case.
When judges started ruling against the Trump administration on his aggressive actions against immigrants and government employees, WND cranked out the complaints them as well as family members, most of which were also written by Unruh:
- ‘Judicial coup against the sitting president’: Dems using activist judges to fight Trump
- Judge who ruled against Trump spending cuts apparently has serious conflict of interest
- Daughter of anti-Trump judge now facing the ire of Kash
- Judge who is obstructing Trump warned: ‘You’re hurting the American people’
- Chief Justice Roberts intervenes when district judge thwarts Trump agenda
- There IS a constitutional crisis, and it was created by this judge, report charges
- ‘Unprecedented and illegal’: DOJ seeks halt to order by superjudge preventing Trump’s executive decisions
- Is this the solution to radical judges forcing their agendas on Trump?
- War erupts over local judges nullifying Trump decisions
- ‘Stop this’: Trump team defies judge’s order to halt deportations of violent ‘monsters’
- Trump pushes to impeach ‘troublemaker’ judge as major conflict of interest is discovered
- Dershowitz: John Roberts MOSTLY right about impeaching judges over biased decisions
- ‘Modern-day warfare’: Pam Bondi says U.S. Supreme Court will get involved in ‘out-of-control’ judges
- ‘Grow a pair!’ New push to rein in activist judges blocking President Trump’s agenda
- Congressional hearings on activist judges coming as rogue jurist continues to thwart Trump
- ‘Villainous’: Trump and Musk erupt when they learn dark history of anti-deportation judge
- ‘We can eliminate an entire district court’: Mike Johnson threatens anti-Trump, activist judges
- ‘Not policymakers’: U.S. senators introduce quick solution for out-of-control judges and their injunctions
WND columnists also raged against judges who stood in Trump’s way. Rachel Alexander huffed in a Feb. 10 column:
Despite the fact the American people awarded Republicans a strong mandate by electing Donald Trump as president again and giving Republicans control of both chambers of Congress, Democrats are trying to corruptly undermine this mandate by shopping for left-wing judges in blue areas who will predictably stop Trump’s new policies. The presiding judge in a jurisdiction assigns which judge gets to hear any particular case, and even if some allege they’re assigned randomly, insiders know this is a lie. Many of these U.S. District Court judges are already blocking Trump’s policies.
[…]The founders set up the three branches of government to be co-equal, not for a handful of rogue judges to abuse one branch and overturn the DEMOCRATIC will of the people. Trump’s agenda will get nowhere if these corrupt, rogue judges aren’t exposed.
Wayne Allyn Root had a major meltdown over judges in his March 22 column:
Federal judges like James Boasberg, who is so desperate to keep violent illegal alien gangbangers in the USA at all costs that he even tried to force the Trump administration to turn around the planes in midair carrying these violent gangbangers back to El Salvador.
How could anyone be this desperate to help the worst scum of the earth?
My gut says this isn’t just about insanity or radical communist beliefs. This is about bribery. Judges and politicians like this are “on the take.” They are being bribed. They are getting filthy rich from keeping the border open and keeping bad guys in the USA.
We need to be asking publicly and loudly if Judge Boasberg is on the take from China, the CCP and the Mexican drug cartels.
Could this judge be receiving millions of dollars from the groups who need the border open, the human trafficking, drugs and fentanyl to flow, and the violent gangs like MS-13 and Tren de Aragua to stay in the USA to carry out this vast criminal conspiracy?
I believe many federal judges are on the take.
[…]My gut instincts tell me that, just like Mexico, many American politicians, government bureaucrats and federal judges are bribed by the bad guys, who make billions of dollars from keeping the borders open and the drugs flowing.
Root offered no evidence whatsoever to back up his claims of bribery, though he went on to demand “forensic audits,” “lie detector tests” and “Cayman Islands investigations” of judges.
Robert Knight huffed in his March 25 column that judges are “presiding as kings over national policy” and that “out-of-control federal judges are making the GOP’s case that Democrats have gone off the rails and should never be trusted again with power.”Jerry Newcombe similarly whined in his column the same day:
The Constitution begins “We the people,” not “we the judges.” Lately, there has been a tussle between activist judges and President Trump. Some critics argue that some of these judges are acting as if they were the ones elected to the Oval Office.
[…]With these activist judges, like Boasberg, trying to hamstring President Trump’s attempt to keep America safe from murderous alien gangs, have we the people “ceased to be” our “own rulers”?
None of these columnists explained why Trump is above the law on such issues.