The Media Research Center’s ongoing lovefest for CNN right-winger Scott Jennings continued in a July 11 column by Tim Graham, in which he was mad that Jennings was fact-checked and played a lot of whataboutism to try and counter it:
The “fact checkers” at PolitiFact barely touch the talking heads on cable television anymore. They used to have a serious tilt against the Fox News hosts in prime time. So it’s unsurprising that on July 9, they published their first attack on conservative CNN analyst Scott Jennings, who offered a few tough words about Medicaid beneficiaries.
“There are like almost 5 million able-bodied people on Medicaid who simply choose not to work,” Jennings said July 1 on CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip. “They spend six hours a day socializing and watching television. And if you can’t get off grandma’s couch and work, I don’t want to pay for your welfare.”
Abby Phillip leapt on that immediately, questioning where Jennings found these numbers. Before we get into the “facts” at hand, let’s investigate PolitiFact’s target selection. There is no page on PolitiFact for Phillip. There is one other “fact check” on Phillip’s show, a “True” rating for liberal New York Times columnist Charles Blow.
There is no page on PolitiFact for former MSNBC weekend host Tiffany Cross, who smeared ICE on Phillip’s show on July 8: “We are normalizing a government agency disappearing people. We’re talking about it like it’s no big deal that they are kidnapping people and transporting them to concentration camps, both domestic and foreign.” She said “concentration camps” four times.
New York Post writer Kelly Jane Torrance tried to interrupt her and tell her these terms were inaccurate and insensitive to Jews, but Cross just kept rolling – and Phillip said nothing, unlike when Scott Jennings makes a conservative point.
Amazing that Graham immediately resorts to lame whataboutism to defend Jennings — and we haven’t gotten to the part where he tries to prove the fact-checker wrong. (Similarly amazing is the fact that Graham won’t dismiss Torrance as a right-winger since she writes for the right-wing New York Post.) That’s because he doesn’t actually do so. Instead, he offers more excuses:
As usual, the PolitiFact scribe on the Jennings case, Loreben Turquero, rounded up a conga line of liberal experts – two from the Harvard T. H. Chan School for Public Health, as well as the Brookings Institution, the Kaiser Family Foundation, and the Urban Institute. None of them are assigned a label. But Jennings cited the “conservative” American Enterprise Institute.
This is one of many ways PolitiFact reads exactly like every other liberal media outlet that pretends that liberals are the most nonpartisan, independent experts you can find.
[…]What Jennings said that really offended the ears at PolitiFact was that Medicaid recipients are sitting around watching TV for six hours a day. Did he mean that as a statement of fact or was he making a rhetorical point? Because people make a lot of rhetorical points on CNN that don’t get “fact checked.”
PolitiFact’s experts were aggressively utilized to dismiss the notion that there are actually many “able-bodied” Medicaid recipients. As Turquero concluded: “Studies of nonworking Medicaid recipients have found the majority are women and have a high school education or less. The average age is 41, and more than half have a work history in the past five years.” This doesn’t disprove “able-bodied,” yet they seem to be saying that women over 40 can’t be expected to meet work requirements?
In other words, Graham knows he can’t prove the fact-check wrong — he’s just making excuses to dismiss inconvenient facts. And he proves that with the way he closes his column:
This article illustrates that these liberal outlets are often not “fact checkers” as much as they are “spin spoilers.” They appear offended by the tone of conservative commentary, and they want to discredit it even if the points are rhetorical.
The “fact checkers” have spoken: conservatives probably shouldn’t impose work requirements, or suggest people who don’t meet them are lazy.
Graham appears offended by the tone of fact-checkers who fact-check conservatives. At least he admits that right-wingers like Jennings trade in “spin,” not facts — though he doesn’t explain why spin cannot be fact-checked.