The Media Research Center continued to wage war on Google in a Sept. 24 post by Jorge Bonilla:
The legacy media have cast themselves as staunch defenders of the First Amendment as they circle the wagons for Regime comic Jimmy Kimmel. However, they are nowhere to be seen as Google admits to censorship of conservatives under pressure from the Biden White House.
Here’s the related story that was reported on Fox and Friends on Wednesday, September 24th, 2025:
Actually, Trump leads the current regime, which makes Kimmel … not a “Regime comic.” And of course Bonilla cites “Fox & Friends” — Fox News is the MRC’s favorite news outlet, after all. He continued to huff:
This was a direct, egregious attack on freedom of expression, directed from The White House, that has drawn no coverage across the legacy dial. Which is strange, since they pretend to care about free speech. Put another way, they care about the free speech they care about.
You mean like how the MRC cares only about free speech when it involves their fellow right-wingers?
Michael Morris complained in an Oct. 7 post:
It’s not me. It’s you, a phrase rarely uttered in the dating world, and yet something Google seems to often repeat—but only when it has to.
Such was the tech giant’s counsel-written statement in response to a subpoena from Chairman Jim Jordan’s (R-OH) House Judiciary Committee regarding censorship. From the letter:
“It is unacceptable and wrong when any government, including the Biden Administration, attempts to dictate how the Company moderates content, and the Company has consistently fought against those efforts on First Amendment grounds,” [emphasis added].
MRC Vice President Dan Schneider nearly went line for line in an op-ed on the Alphabet counsel letter, ripping it to shreds for being little more than a “sly censorship ‘confession.’” In the New York Post piece, Schneider made sure readers were eyes-wide-open regarding what the letter actually conveyed:
“Google admitted little, promised less — and pledged to change nothing.
“It offered not confession but evasion.”
Google “revealed nothing new;” it “admitted no wrongdoing;” the platform “volunteered nothing;” it “clarified nothing;” Google “said nothing;” and perhaps worst of all, it “changed nothing.”
Morris did not allow Google to respond to Schneider.
Gabriela Pariseau raged the next day:
Even as the Trump administration works to broker a peace deal between Israel and Gaza, Google once again revealed its utter disdain for America’s ally.
On the second anniversary of the horrific Oct. 7 attacks that sparked Israel’s war in Gaza, the Google News home page promoted just two articles on the war and the ongoing peace negotiations currently in progress. However, Google promoted two of the worst news outlets looking back on the last two years: The Guardian and The Associated Press.
Pariseau’s definition of “worst,” however, meant she attacked reporting from the Guardian and the AP that actually questioned some actions by Israel during its war with Hamas. Apparently, that’s not allowed.
Pariseau returned for an Oct. 20 post:
If you performed a simple Google search for the names of mainstream journalists and thought leaders, you would expect to get a link to their profile or a link to their website or news outlet. But Google has served up something far more sinister.
The search giant fed its users dossiers from the disgraced left-wing activist groupSouthern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which is attempting to brand supporters of President Donald Trump as “extremists,” “white supremacists” and “bigots.” The group has smeared Libs of TikTok creator Chaya Raichik, podcast host and veteran Navy intelligence officer Jack Posobiec and The Daily Wire host Matt Walsh, to name a few, and it seems Google is more than willing to help push that narrative. Google promoted leftist Wikipedia — which repeatedly cited SPLC — and provided direct links to the SPLC website in search results.
“Google hates conservatives, so it is pushing SPLC filth while it pretends to be an innocent bystander,” said MRC Free Speech America VP Dan Schneider. “There’s no reason SPLC should be one of the first results for Stephen Miller, Jack Posobiec or Chaya Raichick. This is a group that lumps together neo-nazi and Ku Klux Klan groups with freedom-loving Americans, concerned parents, practicing Christians and observant Jews.”
Pariseau went on to whine that Raichik was described as an “extremist” — as the founder of the homophobic, right-wing Libs of TikTok should be — instead of an “orthodox Jew.” Pariseau made no effort to disprove anything the SPLC wrote about Raichik, which undermines her claim that the group is “disgraced.”
Catherine Salgado raged in an Oct. 22 post:
Google could be in serious hot water after it reportedly programmed its artificial intelligence to make false accusations against filmmaker and podcast host Robby Starbuck.
Starbuck announced on X Oct. 22 that he is suing Google, accusing the company’s Bard, Gemini and Gemma AI of generating defamatory statements against him. He accused the AI bots of providing “fake criminal allegations including sexual assault, child rape, abuse, fraud, stalking, drug charges, and even saying I was in Epstein’s flight logs.” These claims are “100% fake. All generated by Google’s AI,” he said. I have ZERO criminal record or allegations.”
Now Starbuck, with the legal representation of the Dhillon Law Group, is taking the tech giant to court.
We don’t recall the MRC getting this wound up when an AI engine made up false allegations about a liberal.