WorldNetDaily, being the de facto PR division of the Trump campaign, was absolutely giddy about Donald Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally. One article, such as it was, merely embedded a video of Trump’s speech, and another was only an embedded post from WND’s Twitter/X account that gushed, “The Madison Square Garden arena has reached MAX CAPACITY of 19,500 for the Trump rally today, and the NYPD has reported 75,000 are outside!” Then criticism of the rally came in, and WND couldn’t handle it. Bob Unruh hypocritically ranted in an Oct. 28 article:
Democrats, for years already, have claimed, wildly, that President Donald Trump is a “Hitler.” They insist that he’s a “fascist,” and that’s essentially their only articulable reason why he shouldn’t be elected.
Longtime failed Democrat presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton was interviewed just days ago, and cited her own book, and other officials who align with her, as confirmation of that.
And then she sought to push on American people that Trump was re-acting a 1939 Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden with his event over the weekend.
That was all “news” to MSNBC:
The network, delivering a long list of its political propaganda points to Americans,spent its reporting time making comparisons between the two events, then reporting as if the suggestions were not its own.
“Donald Trump’s extreme rhetoric and rally at Madison Square Garden in New York City has drawn comparisons to when supporters of Hitler packed the Garden in 1939,” the network posted.
It was the Daily Mail, one of the largest publications in the world, that said the network “shockingly” edited in images of the actual Nazi rally into the coverage of Trump’s campaign event, which featured a star-studded list of supporters, packed the house with almost 20,000 fans, and, according to police, had tens of thousands of fans waiting outside.
WND had reported only days ago that Democrats chose the “Hitler” epithet to insult and damage Trump, and potentially spark violence if he’s elected, as in a civilized society, what else should happen if a “Hitler” is elected.
But even in the battle for insults, they lost.
That happened when controversial former Roman Catholic archbishop, Carlo Maria Vigano, who was the Vatican’s ambassador to the U.S. from 2011 until 2016, described Kamala Harras [sic] as “an infernal monster who obeys Satan.”
As we pointed out when he initially cheered Vigano’s vicious insult, Unruh didn’t explain why it’s acceptable to smear Harris as being in league with Satan but likening Trump to Hitler is somehow beyond the pale — and he didn’t tell his readers that WND repeatedly likened Barack Obama to Hitler and other Nazis. Of course, that fact would have undercut his sense of outrage.