WND, Farah Had A Sad Over Tucker Carlson’s Firing

WorldNetDaily first reacted to Fox News’ firing of right-wing propagandist Tucker Carlson by trying to blame Ray Epps. But like other ConWeb outlets, it went into fret-and-defense mode for him:

• An April 25 article by Bob Unruh hyped that for a short time, he posted on his website an ad offering those who sign up on his site to be given details about ‘what Tucker’s up to next.'”
• Later that day. Joe Kovacs promoted a video Carlson post teasing his future plans.
• An April 28 article by Peter LaBarbera touted how “Tucker Carlson is viewed much more favorably than Fox News, the cable network that just let him go, among middle-aged and older voters, Republicans and conservatives, according to a new survey by Rasmussen Reports, a favorite polling firm on the right.”
• A May 1 article by Kovacs focused on Tucker’s continued status as a Fox News employee.

Meanwhile, editor Joseph Farah — who was one of those suggesting Epps got Carlson fired — continued to be a total Tucker stan. He was spewing conspiracy theories and going Godwin about the firing in his April 25 column:

Call it for what it is – election interference, Biden protection, next year’s version of the laptop from hell.

I speak of the firing of Tucker Carlson, the bravest, most fearless man on television. No one else came close – not in a million years. Connect the dots.

You had Chuckie Schumer’s spleen-felt televised message to Rupert Murdoch, directing him to fire Carlson or, at least, censor his promised multi-part series on the Jan. 6 hoax. It was effective. It turned it into a one-part series. Then there were Tucker’s gutsy references to the fraudulent elections of 2020. That must have stuck in Murdoch’s craw. Then came Sunday night’s “60 Minutes” ode to Ray Epps, the one man safe from the Liz Cheney’s House Unselect Committee of Jan. 6 – and CBS predictably blamed Tucker again. One would have to be blind or a Democrat not to see the fix was in.

America is in deep, deep trouble.

First they came for Andrew Breitbart, in 2012. Then they came for Matt Drudge, in 2018. Then they came with COVID-19 just in time for the election of 2020. Then, in 2022, they came for WND and some other defiant ones in the internet (via demonetization). Then they came for Tucker Carlson.

Am I being overly dramatic by drawing parallels to the era of Nazis? Not on your life! Figure out what I am saying. The Deep State plays for keeps.

And being utterly shameless, he managed to turn this pro-Tucker rant into self-victimhood and a money beg:

Will he be back on television, ever? Why not? Ask yourself that question. He had the ratings – even for Fox. But it was not enough. That’s the way the media work now. It happened years ago for WND, too. We were the first. We were popular. We stood here for 25 years. But Google took away the money. Facebook took away the money. Amazon took away the money. All we have left is your support.

Don’t let the woke mob and the ruling elite take it away.

Please consider helping us continue to expose the Deep State that has canceled Tucker by making a generous tax-deductible donation to the nonprofit 501(c)(3) WND News Center. You can designate a one-time gift or a repeating monthly donation, using credit/debit card or PayPal.

Farah spent the first half of his April 26 column taking credit for building Newsmax leader Christopher Ruddy’s success in right-wing media, whining at one point:

His idea was always to start a TV station – which he finally achieved in 2014. I was not impressed and have not become a fan. It was not ever very conservative, and lately, one of his ex-hosts, Grant Stinchfield, told me a story of how Newsmax advised him to “attack” Tucker Carlson. In fact, in this news report and video Stinchfield claims his refusal to attack Tucker was the reason he was fired from Newsmax. So, not a chance Tucker will ever work there.

Actually, Newsmax wants you to forget it ever criticized Carlson for being a pro-Russia shill — which seems like as good a reason as any to criticize him — because it’s trying to woo him to Newsmax. Farah, however, wants Carlson to go even further right:

How about Tucker joining Glenn Beck and Blaze Media? He likes Glenn Beck and so do I. But it’s not TV. So, I don’t think so.

That leaves MSNBC and CNN. Incredibly bad blood there for Tucker.

So that about does it. Where else can Tucker Carlson go?

I would cajole Tucker to consider a quiet, up-and-coming new TV network, Real America’s Voice. It may soon supplant Fox because it lives up to its name. They have some stars in their constellation – Steve Bannon, Charlie Kirk, the aforementioned Grant Stinchfield, Dr. Gina Loudon, who once worked at WND, and Fox’s super-talented Ed Henry, not to mention John Solomon – a real journalist. There are others worth mentioning, but you can do a little research on the next great network in America.

[…]

But former President Donald Trump is very aware of Real America’s Voice. It broadcasts every Trump event, every rally, every speech. He loves it. And so do his fans. You’ve probably seen many of them televised on WND via Real America’s Voice.

I would say it’s the only game in town.

It’s the kind of career move Tucker would consider – unless he wants to run on Trump’s ticket. That’s another possibility – but I would love to see Tucker back on TV.

You might remember that Loudon wrote a WND column defending her teenage daughter’s relationship with a 57-year-old man, which WND quietly disappeared a few years later as she tried to boost her standing in pro-Trump circles.

For his May 1 column, Farah was angry to learn that people outside his right-wing bubble hate Carlson:

For most of us, the firing of Tucker Carlson by Fox News left us with a hole in our heart and our lives – much like the untimely death of Rush Limbaugh. The only difference was one hour a day versus three hours a day to look forward to.

But for the fake media and Big Tech, the censorious class, they were beside themselves; they got what they wanted. In their eyes, it was like a dream-come-true, what they had been hoping for, longing for, yearning for.

How else can you characterize the hateful reviews of what he said day after day as the only Big League journalist and commentator walking out of step with the crowd? Honestly, they will soon have nothing else talk about and write about – nothing left about which their spleens could hope to ooze more toxic bile. They’re like the walking dead. They got their victim – but there’s nothing left to eat.

Who am I talking about?

Well, most of you probably didn’t have time to keep up with all of Tucker’s detractors. They were legion.

[…]

Wow! The jealously and hatred of these impostor journalists is palpable, isn’t it? There’s no shortage of them. They’re just everywhere. From the New York Times to the truthfully named Daily Beast, they are all obsessed with Tucker. Why? Because he has a different point of view and articulates it clearly and accurately. That’s his “sin.” His only one apparently.

It can’t possibly have anything to do with Carlson’s history of lies and eagerness to use lies and conspiracy theories to destroy the lives of innocent people like Epps.