Last year, WorldNetDaily writer Bob Unruh was overly excited at the prospect of banning gay marriage, even though none of the schemes he hyped ever came to fruition. He’s back at it again in a June 9 article:
A new analysis at SCOTUSBLOG, which monitors all things Supreme Court, reports and comments on them, has confirmed that there’s a new “invigorated” campaign to overturn the Supreme Court’s politicized creation of same-sex marriage for the entire nation.
The leftists on the court at that time, several who since departed, simply subverted the democratic process in America, through which such changes in practice would be developed through the electoral process, and mandated that everyone accept the extremist agenda.
The results have been damaging for those who declined to change their religious beliefs to conform to the agenda pushed by the likes of then-Supreme Court justice Ruth Ginsberg.
[…]Now the online analysis confirms that that issues remain complicated, but “an invigorated anti-Obergefell campaign is under way.”
Obergefell was the label of the case the five justices on the Supreme Court used to impose same-sex marriage, over the protests of the four-justice dissent which pointed out that the Constitution doesn’t mention marriage, and such disputes should be left to states.
In fact, the analysis noted that “certain powers, such as marital arrangements,” long have been left to the states.
Being a Colorado native, Unruh felt the need to once again trash his home state:
In Colorado, for example, state officials repeatedly have attacked Christians, a baker, web designer and counselor, for refusing to give up their Christian faith and adopt the anti-Christian beliefs. The Supreme Court has struck down that state agenda on First Amendment grounds, but those are not the only cases where refusing to promote the LGBT agenda has resulted in real harm to individuals. A bookstore and a maker of athletic clothing are the latest to be coerced by Colorado to change their beliefs, and are fighting back in court.
Unruh went on to baselessly insist that gay marriage is an “ideology,” as if regular marriage is not also an ideology. He also refused to allow any critic of this initiative to have a say.