An anonymously written June 4 WorldNetDaily article claims:
An internet commentator has posted online a video of the home of multiple California voters.
Twenty-six voters, precisely.
Who live at a portable toilet.
In a vacant parking lot.
At least that’s according to officials in state government there who say those “voters” are registered at that address.
The report from Benny Johnson:
[…]Johnson couldn’t hide his suspicions: “How are Democrats cheating in L.A.? Let me show you. … There are 26 registered voters at this toilet in Los Angeles. I’m not kidding. I have the voter records. See for yourself. The only thing here is a stinky port-a john inside an empty parking lot. No homes. No mailboxes. No businesses. Yet TWENTY SIX ‘people’ are casting ballots here. Straight-up voter fraud out in the open. This just a glimpse of what’s happening under Gavin Newsom. This is why California desperately needs Voter ID — and we must pass the Save Act NOW.”
Well, not so much, as a fact-checker found:
But there is no “evidence of voter fraud,” in relation to the voters registered at 100 Sunset Avenue, Michael Sanchez, the communications manager for the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder, told AFP (archived here).
The site was “associated with a shelter or transitional housing,” he said in a January 22 email, which is confirmed by publicly available city records (archived here).
From February 2020, 100 Sunset was the location of an emergency shelter known as a Bridge Home which housed more than 150 people (archived here).
The Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder’s website says eligible Californians can register to vote provided they have a place where they can receive mail and can be properly assigned to a voting precinct (archived here).
Another fact-checker added:
Sanchez said that if a facility address is used as a mailing address and voting materials are returned undeliverable, election officials follow standard list-maintenance protocols. That can include inactivating someone’s voter registration until the voter updates or confirms the address.
“Any ballots cast by voters associated with these records are subject to the same verification and security as all ballots, including signature verification and the statutory notice-and-cure process,” Sanchez wrote.
WND did not update the article to reflect that fact that its central claim has been discredited.